Posts

The Uncomfortable Truth About Difficult Conversations (And Why Most Training Gets It Wrong)

Let me tell you something that'll make your HR department squirm: 87% of workplace conflicts could be resolved in under ten minutes if people just knew how to have a proper difficult conversation. But instead, we dance around issues like we're auditioning for Dancing with the Stars.

I've been training managers and executives across Australia for the past 18 years, and I've watched grown adults literally hide in bathroom stalls to avoid having a tough chat with their team members. It's absolutely bonkers.

Here's my first controversial opinion: Most "difficult conversation" training is complete rubbish because it teaches you to be nice instead of being honest. There's a massive difference.

The Problem With Being "Professional"

You know what drives me mental? The obsession with being "professional" during difficult conversations. Professional has become code for "say nothing meaningful while using corporate buzzwords."

I was working with a mining company in Perth last year - brilliant operation, shocking communication. The site manager told me he'd been trying to address an underperformance issue for six months using "professional language." Six bloody months! Meanwhile, productivity was tanking because everyone knew about the problem except the person causing it.

Real talk: Sometimes you need to be direct. Not rude, not aggressive, but direct.

The Authenticity Factor

Here's where I'm going to lose some of you. I think Australian workplaces are too polite. We've confused being nice with being helpful, and it's killing our ability to solve problems quickly.

The best difficult conversation I ever witnessed was between two engineers at a construction site in Brisbane. One bloke looked at the other and said, "Mate, your designs are causing safety issues. We need to fix this today or people could get hurt."

Boom. Done. No fluff, no corporate speak, just facts and consequences.

That conversation lasted ninety seconds and prevented what could have been a serious workplace accident. Compare that to the three-hour mediation session I facilitated the week before where nobody actually said what they meant.

What Nobody Tells You About Timing

Most training courses bang on about choosing the right time and place for difficult conversations. Sure, that matters. But here's what they don't tell you: waiting for the "perfect moment" is usually just procrastination in disguise.

I've seen managers wait months for the right time to address issues. Meanwhile, the problem festers, team morale drops, and good employees start looking for new jobs.

The right time for a difficult conversation is usually right now.

The Scripts Don't Work

Corporate training loves giving you scripts. "When you do X, I feel Y, and I need Z." Sounds lovely in theory. Feels robotic in practice.

People aren't stupid. They can tell when you're reading from a mental script, and it immediately puts them on the defensive. It's like those awful customer service calls where you can hear the person clicking through their computer prompts.

What works better? Being genuinely curious about their perspective while being crystal clear about the issue that needs addressing.

Where Most Managers Stuff It Up

After nearly two decades in this game, I can predict exactly where most managers will derail a difficult conversation. They'll start strong with the facts, then completely lose their nerve when the other person gets emotional.

News flash: emotions aren't the enemy in difficult conversations. They're information.

If someone gets upset when you're addressing their performance, that tells you something. Maybe they're embarrassed. Maybe they're frustrated because they know you're right. Maybe they're dealing with stuff outside work that's affecting their performance.

Don't shut down emotions. Don't try to fix them either. Just acknowledge them and keep steering the conversation toward solutions.

The Follow-Up Nobody Does

Here's my second controversial opinion: most difficult conversations fail not because of what happens in the room, but because of what doesn't happen afterward.

You have the tough chat, everyone nods, handshakes all around, and then... nothing. No follow-up, no check-ins, no accountability. It's like going to the gym once and expecting to be fit.

I worked with Telstra a few years back (brilliant company culture, by the way), and they had this simple system: every difficult conversation automatically triggered a 30-day follow-up meeting. Not to rehash the issue, but to check progress and offer support.

Genius. Simple. Effective.

Why Context Matters More Than Content

The biggest mistake I see in managing difficult conversations is focusing too much on what to say instead of understanding why the conversation is difficult in the first place.

Sometimes it's not about the specific issue at all. Sometimes it's about trust, respect, or feeling heard.

I remember facilitating a session between a team leader and one of their reports. Thirty minutes in, I realised the real issue wasn't the missed deadlines they were supposedly there to discuss. The real issue was that the team member felt micromanaged and had basically given up trying.

Once we addressed the actual problem instead of the symptom, everything else sorted itself out pretty quickly.

The Confidence Game

Here's something that might surprise you: confidence in difficult conversations isn't about not being nervous. It's about being nervous and doing it anyway.

The best conversationalists I know still get butterflies before tough discussions. The difference is they've learned that discomfort doesn't mean they're doing it wrong. Usually, it means they're doing something important.

Getting Real About Personality Types

Not everyone communicates the same way. Shocking revelation, I know. But seriously, most training treats every difficult conversation like it's the same recipe.

Your direct, no-nonsense employee needs a different approach than your sensitive, people-pleaser. Your analytical type needs data and logic. Your relationship-focused person needs to understand the impact on the team.

One size fits nobody when it comes to difficult conversations.

The Technology Trap

Can we please stop having difficult conversations over email? Please? I'm begging you.

Email strips out tone, body language, and the ability to clarify misunderstandings in real time. It turns difficult conversations into difficult correspondence, and that helps nobody.

Pick up the phone. Walk to their desk. Use video calls if you're remote. But for the love of all that's holy, stop trying to address complex interpersonal issues through written messages.

What Actually Works

After years of watching conversations go sideways and occasionally watching them transform relationships, here's what actually moves the needle:

Start with your intention. If you're going into the conversation to prove you're right or to vent your frustration, you've already lost. Go in with the genuine intention to solve the problem together.

Be specific about the impact. Don't say "your attitude is poor." Say "when you interrupted Sarah three times in yesterday's meeting, it seemed to shut down her ideas and the rest of the team stopped contributing."

The Bottom Line

Most people avoid difficult conversations because they think they'll make things worse. But here's the thing: avoiding them definitely makes things worse. The conversation you're not having is probably the most important one you need to have.

Yes, it's uncomfortable. Yes, it requires practice. No, you won't get it right every time.

But here's what I've learned after facilitating thousands of these conversations: most people actually want the feedback. They want to know where they stand, what's expected, and how they can improve.

We're not doing anyone any favours by tiptoeing around issues. We're just making everything harder than it needs to be.

The uncomfortable truth about difficult conversations is that they're only difficult because we make them that way. Strip away the overthinking, the corporate speak, and the fear of conflict, and you're left with what they really are: opportunities to solve problems and build stronger working relationships.

That's worth getting uncomfortable for.